Katie Couric (who is my guest for Courtside Episode 3 dropping on July 5) remarked at dinner last week that no one has done the definitive explainer comparing what Trump did at Mar a Lago with what Hillary Clinton did.
Your ‘explainer’ was excellent. The problem is the citizens who need to hear it won’t be listening. How do we solve this problem especially with an election upcoming?
Heard several relate Trump's classified doc to Hillarys, but most claim it's not at all similar.
What hasn't been done yet is to fully explain how Trump could have won in 2016 when we now know how the election of 2016 was tainted with Russian interference, together with Putin's admission at Helsinki to CNN that he and his people interfered with 2016.
If 2020 was measurably interfered with, why not 2016? When was the last time Republicans won without it being an Electoral College win? That is the most important question about 2016.
US intelligence agencies informed the leaders of the American government that the US presidential election of 2016 was being interfered with by Russia. President Obama wanted to explain that to the American public, but the Republicans in Congress refused to join him in a bipartisan explanation, and he was afraid that releasing such information by himself would look partisan and lack credibility if the Republicans then turned around and attacked him for doing so.
US intelligence agencies informed the leaders of the American government that the US presidential election of 2016 was being interfered with by Russia. President Obama wanted to explain that to the American public, but the Republicans in Congress refused to join him in a bipartisan explanation, and he was afraid that releasing such information by himself would look partisan and lack credibility if the Republicans then turned around and attacked him for doing so.
Your ‘explainer’ was excellent. The problem is the citizens who need to hear it won’t be listening. How do we solve this problem especially with an election upcoming?
Heard several relate Trump's classified doc to Hillarys, but most claim it's not at all similar.
What hasn't been done yet is to fully explain how Trump could have won in 2016 when we now know how the election of 2016 was tainted with Russian interference, together with Putin's admission at Helsinki to CNN that he and his people interfered with 2016.
If 2020 was measurably interfered with, why not 2016? When was the last time Republicans won without it being an Electoral College win? That is the most important question about 2016.
I have subscribed.
US intelligence agencies informed the leaders of the American government that the US presidential election of 2016 was being interfered with by Russia. President Obama wanted to explain that to the American public, but the Republicans in Congress refused to join him in a bipartisan explanation, and he was afraid that releasing such information by himself would look partisan and lack credibility if the Republicans then turned around and attacked him for doing so.
US intelligence agencies informed the leaders of the American government that the US presidential election of 2016 was being interfered with by Russia. President Obama wanted to explain that to the American public, but the Republicans in Congress refused to join him in a bipartisan explanation, and he was afraid that releasing such information by himself would look partisan and lack credibility if the Republicans then turned around and attacked him for doing so.
How do I listen as a free subscriber?
Oh Neal, isn’t there something better to do with that big brain of yours. I can’t even bring myself to read it.